In my recent post, Walmart: Our Soul - Less Money, I responded to a post by Corey Smith. Evidently I raised a few hackles when I stepped up on my soap box, and I loved the comments. They were both challenging and insightful…
So I wanted to respond to a few.
Tsudonimh, writes:
I take issue with the idea that competitive pricing is eroding the soul of America. I think Liberalism, Communism and Too-much-governmentism is a much larger threat. As far as manufacturing in the U.S. I’d say Labor unions have been a much greater detriment than Walmart could ever be… Perhaps the US should continue to strive for knowledge based jobs and allow markets to regulate themselves. Labor unions have bargained their way out of a job in many cases and I don’t blame Walmart at all.
Tsudonimh, first let me explain that I firmly believe in both self-governance and accountability. I do not believe that individuals or societies should do anything in excess; History has classically demonstrated that when over-indulgence or under-availability is at issue this often leads to a societies ruin in the end.
The term capitalism was coined, oddly enough, by Karl Marx to illustrate a distribution of power, wealth, and influence to a controlling minority. Now I know you do not believe in government, and we have had these discussions from time to time, but the opposite “extreme” cannot be pleasant either. Why? Because this would wreak of dictatorship.
So, America has found ways to accommodate a fairly stable economy by taking a middle road between total intervention and none whatsoever. The US Department of State, via About.com had this to say:
…the United States and many other countries have intervened in their economies to limit concentrations of power and address many of the social problems associated with unchecked private commercial interests. As a result, the American economy is perhaps better described as a “mixed” economy, with government playing an important role along with private enterprise.
Furthermore, unions were a response to unfair labor practices during the early industrial revolution - where government (read, a government for the people by the people) would not intervene. While I would agree I think the Unions have become as bloated as the pork-barrelling politicians on Capitol Hill, they originally served a purpose; however, it has now reached its zenith due to, yet again, excessive overtures by its members.
Walmart is not a detriment to the American way - in fact it actually underscores raw capitalism at work (at least as close as you can get in a regulated economy). In point of fact, I think “selfish-ism” is eroding the state of America to be frank… the “what’s in it for me” attitude coupled with blatant disregard for others’ well-being.
People often use “it’s just business” as an excuse to trample over everyone and everything in their path. They become myopic and loose site of the grander vision of the human experience. Admittedly, this ‘human experience’ is, and should always be, unique to each and every one of us.
Does this allow for employees of a company to have free reign over the company, taking payment and not rendering services? Certainly not. Again, it is a partnership between provider and consumer, business and employee - a symbiotic relationship to be sure.
So the real question about Walmart’s practices is not a question of good versus evil, rather it is a question of which ecosystem do we want to be a part of? The local community where we shop down the street, the national community where our goods may come from other Americans, or a global community where our goods, and services, might come from anywhere else?
Now, most have decided, via their purchasing decisions (their vote), that they would prefer to be part of a global ecosystem. The only rub there is that while we are hungrily consuming goods imported from other ecosystems, the foreign entities are not consuming any of ours because they can produce it themselves or find it on the global market much cheaper.
So how do you intend to keep paying for your supply, if your products or services are not in demand?
Sure the market will regulate itself, but are you willing to go hungry while it does so?
As Greg Walters said, “…once again, this is not Rocket Science, it’s Economics…”
Photo credit to Dayaran.
Ken Stewart’s blog, ChangeForge.com, focuses on the collision between the constantly changing worlds of business and technology. Ken is also the Director of Technology at Kearns Business Solutions.
To all of my readers, I hope you are well. I thought I would take a pause and share with you some really great resources for business and technology on the web that I’ve enjoyed.
My friend and colleague, 
Change is not easy to implement in an organization. People are resistant to change. The fact is, much of what we try improve with change fails. Not because that the change is bad, but because we don’t make sure the change itself succeeds.
Thanks to Microsoft and many other companies for making a job for poor ole’ me!
