Jul 03 2008
Walmart: Our Soul - Less Money
Corey honored me with a nice little jab on his blog regarding a comment to his post on loving Walmart.
In my opinion, Walmart is soulless - but not a bad business. Corey seems to think it’s because Walmart is SO incredibly big, that they are a target now… That sounds like a whiny excuse to me…
Maybe there is some truth from the driveling masses who might shop there, but Charles Fishman (FastCompany) had a few other ideas about Walmart,
Walmart has also lulled shoppers into ignoring the difference between the price of something and the cost. Its unending focus on price underscores something that Americans are only starting to realize about globalization: Ever-cheaper prices have consequences. Says Steve Dobbins, president of thread maker Carolina Mills: “We want clean air, clear water, good living conditions, the best health care in the world–yet we aren’t willing to pay for anything manufactured under those restrictions.”
Charles writes an extremely compelling argument detailing the simple fact that Walmart has one mission: “To bring the lowest possible prices to its customers.”
How noble, right? Some might say so. Walmart vendors would credit Walmart as a quick paying account, but one that expects year-over-year pricing decreases for products it commonly sells. If you as a vendor can’t supply the massive quantities they require at the prices they require, they’ll outsource to an overseas supplier who can.
What does that mean for you and I? Well, we get low prices but at what cost? That’s a tough question and one that MasterLock had to answer:
Randall Larrimore, a former CEO of MasterBrand Industries, the parent company of Master Lock, understands that contradiction too well. For years, he says, as manufacturing costs in the United States rose, Master Lock was able to pass them along. But at some point in the 1990s, Asian manufacturers started producing locks for much less. “When the difference is $1, retailers like Walmart would prefer to have the brand-name padlock or faucet or hammer,” Larrimore says. “But as the spread becomes greater, when our padlock was $9, and the import was $6, then they can offer the consumer a real discount by carrying two lines. Ultimately, they may only carry one line.”
In January 1997, Master Lock announced that, after 75 years making locks in Milwaukee, it would begin importing more products from Asia. Not too long after, Master Lock opened a factory of its own in Nogales, Mexico. Today, it makes just 10% to 15% of its locks in Milwaukee–its 300 employees there mostly make parts that are sent to Nogales, where there are now 800 factory workers.
Larrimore did the first manufacturing layoffs at Master Lock. He negotiated with Master Lock’s unions himself. He went to Bentonville. “I loved dealing with Wal-Mart, with Home Depot,” he says. “They are all very rational people. There wasn’t a whole lot of room for negotiation. And they had a good point. Everyone was willing to pay more for a Master Lock. But how much more can they justify? If they can buy a lock that has arguably similar qual-ity, at a cheaper price, well, they can get their consumers a deal.”
It’s Wal-Mart in the role of Adam Smith’s invisible hand. And the Milwaukee employees of Master Lock who shopped at Walmart to save money helped that hand shove their own jobs right to Nogales. Not consciously, not directly, but inevitably. “Do we as consumers appreciate what we’re doing?” Larrimore asks. “I don’t think so. But even if we do, I think we say, Here’s a Master Lock for $9, here’s another lock for $6–let the other guy pay $9.”
Is it wrong to pay less? Is it wrong to ask someone to accept less money than I would take so I can pay less of my money? Not necessarily, but in the end where does this lead? Are we leveraging our soul so we spend less money?
Corey, yes they are big, but is that why they are a target?
Ken Stewart’s blog, ChangeForge.com, focuses on the collision between the constantly changing worlds of business and technology. Ken is also the Director of Technology at Kearns Business Solutions.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Add New Comment
Viewing 6 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
As far as manufacturing in the U.S. I'd say Labor unions have been a much greater detriment than Walmart could ever be. If you are forced to pay $25 an hour starting out and then add 401K contributions plus health care why wouldn't you move manufacturing to China? Perhaps the US should continue to strive for knowledge based jobs and allow markets to regulate themselves.
Labor unions have bargained their way out of a job in many cases and I don't blame Walmart at all.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I think it's a matter of perspective. As the struggling consumer.. we have to take advantage and appreciate the 'low-prices'- no matter how it is formulated. The buyer/seller has a tough market and a tough responsibility. I Don't thing there is any easy solution (at least thes days), we as the consumer will have to bow to the low price guru's until something changes in our economy.
Let me know when that happens.
:)
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
If WalMart sold pet food that killed our dogs or toys laced with child-killing poison - then WalMart would be out of business...er...wait...didn't that...never mind...
....to the post editor I go to write a rant...
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Walmart is not a detriment to the American way - in fact it actually underscores raw capitalism at work (at least as close as you can get in a regulated economy). I would also agree that Labor unions have ended up causing more problems than they are worth - but it is not the unions themselves - nor government itself - that is the problem.
Remember, these are organizations, groups, of people who run things into the ground. I think that in general those doing their job and working hard are content to keep doing so and do not stand up to a growing minority of people looking out for numero uno.
I have worked with a global company and seen first hand what an economy that is almost solely knowledge-based ends up becoming. Look to the UK... a once great force that has dwindled to a mere shadow of its former glory - not to say that it was all that good, just powerful.
What is funny is that we really aren't pursuing knowledge based jobs... we are outsourcing computer programming to Russia, India, and a few other places and not pushing nearly as many math and science based jobs through college as we once did (speaking of engineering, etc.).
Instead, we look for the easy money - payoff without true work, and thus we are trading our souls sir... It is not Walmart that is the problem... you miss my point, or perhaps I did not make such a point clear... it is us as consumers that are trading our soul for a cheaper price... in my humble opinion.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
"The Wal-Mart Effect," http://www.walmarteffectbook.com
Or...
http://www.amazon.com/Wal-Mart-Effect-Powerful-...
/Charles Fishman, Fast Company, cnfish@mindspring.com
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
When Walmart first got into the grocery business, I watched them as they became larger than all of the Fortune 500 grocers, our then-current customers, combined. It was amazing to watch, and I quickly realized Walmart had stepped outside of the normal economy and had become and economic market unto itself...
Add New Comment
Trackbacks